- The Ideal Leader
- Society’s Ideal Leaders
- Qualities Society Believes of Ideal Leaders
- Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Techniques for Effective Communication
My Ideal Leader
Dr. Katherine L. Adams is my ideal leader. She is a professor in the California State University, Fresno from the department of Communication. Her points of interest include communication between two persons, pragmatic approach to relational communication, communicative phenomena relating to naturalistic inquiry, and communication. She is a unique author with many educative group theory contents and a great writer of interpersonal and communication of group. (“Fresno State”)
Society’s Ideal Leaders
Our society often considers some types of leaders as ideal leaders. This types of leaders are those leader they look up to as the best because of their high positions and parastatas. Such leaders include; the pope, chancellors, presidents of different organizations, governors, chief executive officers (CEOs) of organizations, founders of foundations, commanders of the armed forces, lead singers, spiritual leaders, shortstops and captains, managing directors, majority owners, head coach, top actors, actresses and film directors, etc.
Qualities Society Believes of Ideal Leaders
Our society often consider some types of leaders as ideal leaders. This kinds of leaders are those who express their leadership skills, some of these qualities include;
Someone who sees the master plan and is an unbiased individual who acts with a receptive outlook. He is someone who is agile, quick and neat in movement and a very adaptable personality, an individual who is approachable and who exhibits inclusivity and appreciation and honor for peers. He is a person who shows compassion, a change agent and one who shows an identifiable presence. He can think on his or her feet without drifting and can keep up savvy intellectuality. This individual is a powerful communicator and got the quality of a cost-effective advertiser, he is one who keeps up a positive and energetic state of mind and a cooperative person who regards staff and shows enthusiasm for his works, He can designate duties and keeps up individual trustworthiness.
Problem-Solving and Decision-Making Techniques for Effective Communication
Dr. Katherine L. Adams and Gloria G. Galanes established in their book “Communicating in Groups: Applications and Skills”. The techniques for problem-solving and decision-making for effective communication are;
- Task Difficulty: Some difficult tasks can be more complex. Groups have to be prepared to explore, and talking about a difficult and complex assignment with a specific end goal to add to a common foundational knowledge. This normally requires individual work outside of the group and continuous group meetings to share information.
- The number of possible solutions: There are generally different approaches to take care of an issue or complete an undertaking; however a few problems have more potential solutions than others. Some other problems may be creative based.
- Group member interest in the problem: At the point when group members are keen on the problem, they will be more drawn in with the problem-solving process and put resources into discovering a quality solution. Groups with high enthusiasm for and learning about the issue may need more opportunity to create and establish solution, while groups with low interest may incline toward a leader who gives structure and direction.
- Group member familiarity with the problem: A few groups experience a problem routinely, while different problems are more special or surprising. Many groups that depend on funding need to revisit a financial plan every year, and lately, groups have needed to get more innovative with financial plans as funding has been cut in about every sector. At the point when group members aren’t acquainted with the problem, they will need to do background research on what similar groups have done and might likewise need to invite professionals outside the group.
- The need for solution acceptance: Groups must consider what number of individuals their choice will influence and the amount of “buy-in” from others the group needs for a solution to be effectively executed. In difficult cases of decision making, groups will need to survey the individuals who will be influenced by the solution and may need to do a pilot usage to perceive how people respond. Forcing an incredible solution that doesn’t have a buy-in from partners can in any case lead to failure.
- Fresno State. (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://www.fresnostate.edu/artshum/communication/faculty-staff/faculty/adams.html
- The World’s 50 Greatest Leaders (2014). (2014, March 20). Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://www.fortune.com/2014/03/20/worlds-50-greatest-leaders/
- ASAE. The Center for Association Leadership. (n.d). Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://www.asaecenter.org/Resources/AMMagSidebarDetail.cfm?ItemNumber=10779
- Problem Solving and Decision Making in Groups. (n.d.). Retrieved July 10, 2015, from https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/a-primer-on-communication-studies/s14-03-problem-solving-and-decision-m.html
Also see this: