Home / Research Papers / Business / Aardvark Corporation Alternative Financing Options Project

Aardvark Corporation Alternative Financing Options Project

Aardvark Corporation

Executive Summary

The company Aardvark Corporation has focused or predicted the revenues and expenses, in order to meet the newly signed contracts, there is also focus on the planning and expansion of the project. Therefore, the feasibility is checked and capital budgeting technique is applied to check out that the project is to be discarded.

Aardvark Corporation for the enhancement of the project that is signed can focus on a sufficient option, as there can be the three alternatives to the capital structures that include the equity, long-term bond, and the financing source.

For the evaluation of project or to focus on the desirability of the project, that it should be accepted or reject. The WACC is used in the three available capital structures for the calculations:

Aardvark Corporation Alternative Financing Options Project

The WACC is given below, as the existing return rate of the company is mentioned, WACC data and the NPV analysis, indicates the negative figures, the company is going in a loss, therefore, it is recommended to reject the project.

Original Project

In the Eastern Washington there is the small company known as Aardvark Corporation, however, the company is in the commercial and military airline industry; therefore, it produces the avionic parts and the equipment for that purpose. Moreover, the company had won the contracts and thus, the company is planning to do the expansion project and for the expansion, there is need of the total $92 million for the initial investment. In this way, a company can start with the installation of the equipment. After that, the company would sell the scrap value of $6 million, for the expansion of the project, there is need of the 30 million dollars in order to make the building for the production facilities, 13 million dollars of the building is expected in the end of the ten years.

The company in this way, in the first year, has expected that there will be sales of 72 million dollars and then there will be a growth of project by 4% per year, however, the fixed costs of the project wills be7.5 million dollars with the administrative expenses. Thus, 61% will be the cost of sale and 18% will be the revenue correspondingly, 36% will be the marginal tax rate and 15% will be the initial discount rate.

Aardvark, in order to access the data, there is the capital budgeting of the project and it is analyzed that the project should not be accepted but the project is signed already. Therefore, there could be the focus on the new way so that the project can be acceptable as the capital structure opportunities focus on the three planned capital structure alternatives.

Alternative Financing Options

The company Aardvark needs to focus on the long-term debt and the equity options, in order to expand the project. However, there could be the three options example, the expansion project by 9% from the financing debt and 90.51% from the equity. However, another option could be 50% from the financing debt and 50% from the equity. The third option could be the entire funds can collect the finance through the source of equity. However, the market data was collected through focused on T-Bond rate 6.8%, book weights, the market risk premium of 7.5%, the Beta 1.18 and the long-term bond of current yield on 6.5%.

Aardvark Corporation Alternative Financing Options Project

The project just not needs to be profitable but it should be feasible, as the project need to generate the higher return and it could be done by raising the equity and the debt. WACC has the three options and the existing discount rate focus on the project with the 15%. The existing rate should be focused on the lenders and investors and there is the need to focus on all the aspect before deciding in conclusion.

The Aardvark plan is higher in the risk with the WACC, however, lower the existing discount rate from few points, because the 12.59% WACC has determined the negative value of NPV. Example the negative NPV we obtained is (5,657,656.46). Therefore, the project should be rejected because, with lower WACC, the project is unacceptable.

The project that is focused on the company seems to be riskier and less feasible because there are different types of the financing. However, the company in this way unable to control the operations because with the increase in interest rates rise there will be the increase in the debt and the company have to pay the higher amount of the interest expense. Thus, there is the need to use equal debt and the equal equity so that there can be the increase in the debt level, if the company tends to increase the interest rate, there will be higher risk level and the costs of component cost. Other than that, the project is of ten years, consequently, the debt will be matured in the 18 years of age, therefore, there can be effects, as there will be the cost service on debt and the company had to bear a cost for more 8 years. The NPV data has shown us the negative figures of the value (3,410,725.13), which means that the company is going to get the lower inflows than the outflows.

There is another plan of the common equity example, the company can finance its new project through the common equity, and still, there are the perceived risks in terms of the stock and the market risk premium. However, the company does not have the control on the money as the change in the capital structure can effect on the cost of equity, on the cost of debt and the WACC. The WACC or the NPV analysis is negative (6,132,604.94). Therefore, Aardvark can suffer the loss and especially if there is involvement of the 100% through equity finance. If the capital structure is different than the project will be still rejected.


For the three planned capital structure indicates, the WACC was calculated, however, the project need to be rejected because every financing option that is considered have demerits. Changing in capital structure cannot add the value in the project but there could be the increase in the cost. However, the optimal capital structure needs to focus on the fund’s example debt financing that are in the ratio, example, 80% of the debt and 20% of the equity. Moreover, there could be better options than equity; cheaper source can include the tax deductibility options. Thus, through this, there will be the positive NPV and from 9% to 10% the cost of capital can be minimized and there can be positive impacts on Aardvark.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *