Home > Subjects > Chemistry > Polymer Structure and Properties

Polymer Structure and Properties


From the “Sigma-Aldrich the “Poly (3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (P3HT)” was purchased. However, the Titanium oxide (TiOx) and Poly (amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendritic wedges were combined in the School of Chemistry, Bangor University. Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)- poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT: PSS) arrangements (CLEVIOS AL 4083) and pH500 were obtained from Heraeus. IC70BA was acquired from Solaris Chem Inc.

(P3HT) Poly (3-Hexylthiophene-2,5-Diyl)

The Regio-standard is known as the infers that every 3-hexylthiophene unit in the chain in this polymer is situated such that the C6H13 deposit gathered; in order to make a beeline for tail or straight on. Regio-consistent poly (3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) is utilized as an electron giver/gap transporter and light safeguard.

Because of these properties the polymer has the characteristics of better requesting and self-association amid statement, there are also the implementation of the gadget portability to expand generously.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures

[sociallocker id=”35370″]

The optical and electrical properties that are considered in the P3HT have been utilized to assess that the level of the HOMO level; which is at 5.1 eV as well as at LUMO level 3.2 bandgap 1.9 eV and the eV.

P3HT can be utilized as an opening transporting polymer to mix the OPV cells and enhancing PCE.

There is focus on the mixture of the OPV cell that focused or created by Gang Li et al. (2005) that utilizing fullerene subordinate; “phenyl-C61-butyric corrosive methyl ester (PCBM)” as well as the P3HT solvent C60 subsidiary. An all-around blended mix film was then shaped by PCBM and P3HT amid dissolvable tempering, as P3HT framed a crystalline fibril-like morphology installed with PCBM totals. Afterward or considering the PCBM mix arrangements were threw on PEDOT: PSS/ITO, vanishing rates were shifted to control the morphology of the mix film.

The ingestion proficiency of the conjugated polymer is additionally enhanced as the p3HT totals and structures fibril-like crystalline morphology. The mobility of the hole focus on the mix PCBM-P3HT conjugated polymer is accounted for to build due to the mixed layers’ stage isolated morphology.

Consequently, it is analyzed that P3HT that there is the thin film that focus on the serving of the electron donor amid photoexcitation and has a high opening portability. Thus, around 2 × 10-1 cm2 V-1 s-1 in very much solidified movies and 10-3 cm2 V-1 s-1 in thin ineffectively composed movies. There is an expansive ingestion range of 400 to 650 P3HT and it has a 550 nm wavelength optical retention crest and nm, in the rich locale vitality with respect to the solar based range at 1.5 AM.

Indene-C70 Bisadduct (IC70BA)

With the comprising of 60 carbon particles (C60); the buck minster fullerenes are steady, sweet-smelling, cluster or round formed groups found in 1985.

However, buck minster fullerenes has the electro active properties, they have increased huge consideration. Up to the six electrons when in arrangement; the C60 is promptly accessible and goes about as electron acceptor that has high electron versatility and acknowledges.

The solar powered cells that have high efficiencies of up to 3.6% with a copper phtalocyanine benefactor and it is broadly connected in bilayer heterojunction (BHJ). They are basically accomplished through vacuum affidavit. They are restricted solvency and along these lines with the testimony.

In the year 1995, Hummelen and colleagues had announced that the methano-fullerene subordinate and the C60 adaptation and Phenyl-C61-butyric corrosive methyl ester (PC61BM) are the soluble version.

With the separation in BHJ solar oriented cells; the effective charge; there is the coming about due to ultrafast photoinduced electron exchange to PCBM; there are also the support of p-type polymer that were likewise given that year.

With these two disclosures there are pushed of the natural solar powered cell advancement further. Generally utilized acceptor in OPV; the PCBM is the most consistent. Semiconductors in the circular shape offers it advantage over other planar 3D electron transport is conceivable in it. Focusing on the end goal to address this, a C70 simple of it, in OPV gadgets as it had a more grounded assimilation; called the PC71BM was created to have a higher photocurrent in the solar powered range’s blue area. Consequently, the principle downside is the feeble retention of visible light.

With the solar oriented cells the conjunction with appropriate low-band hole polymers are concerned as exceedingly upgrade for those of the fusing the C60 and C70 analogs achieve over 8% PCE.

Materials with bring down LUMO have been executed for realizing further enhancements. To empower the tuning of their LUMO and HOMO levels; solubilizing bunches are additionally being connected to the fullerene center to reach the end goal to and furthermore to permit the natural electronic gadgets (OED’s) arrangement handling. Furthermore to accomplish higher open circuit voltage (VOC); the different mono, bis and tris adducts have additionally been produced to exploit the progressions in LUMO levels and. For example,in order to prevalent photovoltaic execution at 0.84 V VOC and 6.48% PCE there is the focus to utilized P3HT-based OSCs as acceptor Indene-C60 bisadduct (IC60BA) that has a LUMO level at 3.74 eV (0.17 eV up-moved than that of PCBM) demonstrates.

There is the demonstration of the substance structure for various C60-based fullerene subsidiaries. After utilizing pre-warm strengthening for 10 minutes at 1500C; the P3HT/IC70BA PSCs with methyl-thiophene added substances have been appeared to have higher PCEs of up to 6.69% with a 0.86 V VOC. With the higher LUMO level of 3.72 eV (0.19 eV higher than that of PCBM); the indene-C70 bisadduct (IC70BA) has additionally been orchestrated.

Poly (Styrenesulfonate) And Poly (3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT: PSS)

Poly (styrenesulfonate) and poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT: PSS) due to its hole conducting properties is utilized; it is known as a part of organic electronics. Cushions or cathode material between dielectric material and the door terminal; it was before utilized as dynamic in the gate electrode.

It has been utilized as a part of OSCs as an anode cushion layer on account of these properties.  It has various points of interest, for example, the high straightforwardness, thermal stability, high transparency and mechanical adaptability.

While its electron fondness is 2.2 eV ; it is extraordinary compared to other opening directing supports and there are enough low to block electrons; as it has a high ionization potential that is relatively equivalent to ITO work.

With the blend PEDOT: PSS is utilized for enhancing the ITO-anode contact. It is a solitary part polymer with two ionomers. Conveying positive charge while the other part (PSS) the primary segment (PEDOT) is a polythiophene polymer and sodium polystyrene sulfonate polymer conveying negative charge.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures

Copper (II) Chloride (CuCl2)

Copper chloride is a substance compound has the great hydration characteristic and made up of the crystals of brown powder. However, it can be decomposes to CuCl and Cl2 at 1000 °C:

2 CuCl2 → 2 CuCl + Cl2

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures


Consequently, the copper chloride is exceptionally very much broke down in water, and in addition in methanol and ethanol, the copper chloride compound loses the twofold hydrate by warming it over 70 ° C crystalline water. Aqueous arrangements of biodegradable copper chloride, pH of 0.2 mW arrangement of 3.6 yet its debasement in CH3)2CO and diethyl ether is powerless. These arrangements have darker shading when focused and end up green until the point that they are done in blue.

Organic Engineered Applications

Copper (II) chloride has response is performed in a polar dissolvable and there are the applications in the amalgamation of natural compounds. However, there are chlorinate the alpha position of carbonyl compounds: for example, (DMF), that frequently manages the sight of lithium chloride, which quickens the response.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures

Copper (II) chloride get dried when has the advances the hydrolysis of acetones CuCl2, within the sight of oxygen, can likewise oxidize phenols.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures

Lithium Chloride

Lithium chloride is known as the salt is a run of the mill concoction and has the compound with the recipe LiCl; it is a ionic compound.

Lithium chloride was utilized quickly in the 1940s as well as the Lithium salts for the most part affect the focal sensory system. There are the contrasting option to nourishment salt, as there are destructive impacts of the compound on the body then it was prohibited.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures


As it disintegrates well in ethanol and pyridine; the lithium chloride complex is all around broke down in water, the compound is as various hydrates. For example, high dissolvability in polar solvents and its high nitrate, which isn’t so in other soluble base metal chlorides, thus, the little size of the lithium particle + Li brings about properties.

Chemical Properties

From the response of lithium hydroxide or lithium chloride is brought from carbonate with hydrochloric corrosive:

LiOH+HCI →LiCI+ H + 2 O

Li2 CO3+2HCI →2LiCI+ H2 O+CO2

The arrangements of lithium chloride can fill in as a wellspring of chloride particle; moreover, LiCl likewise assimilates up to four counterparts of smelling salts/mol. There are some other ionic chloride; hasten upon treatment with silver nitrate, example can be given of the shaping:

LiCl + AgNO3 → AgCl + LiNO3

Experimental Methods

The experimental methods included the spin covering as well as the thermal dissipation; the initial step of the procedure of this strategy focuses on the vacuum throw amid the procedure.

Substrate Arrangement

First there was cutting ITO glass substrates into little pieces with measurements of 2.5 cm x 2 cm, then it was cleaned with cleanser, warm water and deionized water, for the dissolvable and any outstanding photoresists there was the substrates to be in ultrasonic shower for 10 minutes.

Properties of Polymeric Material and Structures

  • Alias, Z. Zabidi, A. Ali, and M. Harun, “Optical characterization and properties of polymeric materials for optoelectronic and photonic applications”, International journal of applied science and technology, Vol. 3, pp. 11-38,
  • Cheknane, H. Hilal, F. Djeffal, B. Benyoucef, and J. Charles, “An equivalent circuit approach to organic solar cell modelling”, Microelectronics Journal, Vol. 39, pp. 1173–1180,
  • Hains, Z. Liang, M. Woodhouse, and B. Gregg, “Molecular Semiconductors in Organic Photovoltaic Cells”, Chemical reviews, Vol. 110(11), pp.6689–6735,
  • Alferov, Zh. I., V. M. Andreev, M. B. Kagan, I. I. Protasov, and V. G. Trofim, 1970, ‘‘Solar-energy converters based on p-n AlxGa12xAs-GaAs heterojunctions,’’ Fiz.Tekh. Poluprovodn. 4, 2378 (Sov. Phys. Semicond. 4, 2047 (1971))
  • Alshahrani, T. M. (2016). Advanced Materials for Organic Solar Cells: Influence of Generation and pH on PAMAM-Based Devices By, (February).
  • Klajnert, M. Bryszewska. “Dendrimers: properties and applications”.Acta Biochimica Polonica. Vol.48 (1), pp.199-208,
  • Qiab and J. Wang, “Fill factor in organic solar cells”, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 15, pp. 8972-8982,
  • Bloch, F, Z. Phys. (1928), 52, 555.
  • Hecht, L. Hu, and G. Irvin, “Emerging transparent electrodes based on thin films of carbon nanotubes, graphene, and metallic nanostructures”, Advanced materials, Vol. 23, pp. 1482-1513,
  • Chapin, C. S. Fuller, and G. L. Pearson (May 1954). “A New Silicon p-n Junction Photocell for Converting Solar Radiation into Electrical Power”. Journal of Applied Physics 25 (5): 676–677. doi:10.1063/1.1721711
  • Dai, B. L., Winkler, B., Dong, L., Tong, L., & Mau, A. W. H. (2001). Conjugated Polymers for Light-Emitting Applications **, (12), 915–925.
  • David C. Brock (Spring 2006). “Useless No More: Gordon K. Teal,Germanium, and Single-Crystal Transistors”. Chemical HeritageNewsmagazine (Chemical Heritage Foundation) 24 (1). Retrieved 2008-01-21.
  • Dou, Y. Liu, Z. Hong, G. Li, and Y. Yan, “Low-bandgap near-IR conjugated polymers/molecules for organic electronics”, Chemical reviews, Vol. 115(23), pp. 12633–12665,
  • Becquerel (1839). “Mémoire sur les effets électriques produits sous l’influence des rayons solaires”. Comptes Rendus 9: 561–567. Issue date: May 7, 1935.
  • Einstein, A, “On the Quantum Theory of Radiation” Phyikalische Zeitschrift 18(1917).
  • Eliseeva, S. V., & Bünzli, J.-C. G. (2011). Rare earths: jewels for functional materials of the future. New Journal of Chemistry, 35(6), 1165. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nj00969e
  • Fraunhofer ISE. (2013). World record solar cell with 44.7% efficiency. Press Release. Retrieved from https://www.ise.fraunhofer.de/en/press-and-media/press-releases/presseinformationen-2013/world-record-solar-cell-with-44.7-efficiency
  • “Investigations of the electrical and non-electrical conductivity of thin indium oxide layers”, Journal of Physics, Vol. 139(5), pp. 504-517, 1954.
  • Yu, J. Gao, J. Hummelen, F. Wudi, A. Heeger. “Polymer Photovoltaic Cells: Enhanced Efficiencies via a Network of Internal Donor-Acceptor Heterojunctions”, Science, Vol. 270 (5243), pp. 1789-1791,
  • Gerald L. Pearson, Daryl M. Chapin, and Calvin S. Fuller (AT&T) receivepatent US2780765, “Solar Energy Converting Apparatus.”(1957)
  • Hovel and J. M. Woodall, “High Efficiency AlGaAs-GaAs Solar Cells”,Appl. Phys. Lett. 21, 379-381 (1972).
  • Hasegawa, T., & Takeya, J. (2009). Organic field-effect transistors using single crystals. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, 10(2), 24314. https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-6996/10/2/024314
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Renewable_Energy_Act
  • Hancox, K. V. Chauhan, P. Sullivan, R. A. Hatton, A. Moshar, C. P. A. Mulcahy and T. S. Jones. “Increased efficiency of small molecule photovoltaic cells by insertion of a MoO3 hole-extracting layer”, Energy & Environmental Science, Vol.3, pp. 107-110,
  • Anthony, A. Facchetti, M. Heeney, S. Marder and X. Zhan. “n-Type Organic Semiconductors in Organic Electronics”, Advanced Materials, Vol.22 (34), pp. 3876–3892,
  • Blakesley and D. Neher, “Relationship between energetic disorder and open-circuit voltage in bulk heterojunction organic solar cells”, Physical review B, Vol. 84, pp. 075210-12, 2011.
  • Zhang, S. Lee, and B. Sun, “Effect of Series and Shunt Resistance on Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Solar Cells Performance”, Electrochimica Acta, Vol. 146, pp. 845-849, 2014.
  • Chen, Z. Xu, Z. Honga and Y. Yang, “Interface investigation and engineering – achieving high performance polymer photovoltaic devices”, Journal of Materials Chemistry, Vol. 20, pp. 2575–2598,
  • Harun, E. Saion, A. Kassim, N. Yahya and E. Mahmud. “Conjugated Conducting Polymers: A Brief Overview”. Journal for the advancement of science and art. Vol.2, pp. 63-68,
  • Mihailetchi, V. (2005). Device physics of organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. PhD, Holland. Retrieved from https://dissertations.ub.rug.nl/faculties/science/2005/v.d.mihailetchi/?pLanguage=en&pFullItemRecord=ON
  • Nehaoua, Y. Chergui, and D. Mekki, “Determination of organic solar cell parameters based on single or multiple pin structures”, Vacuum, Vol. 84(2), pp. 326-329,
  • Sahu, B. Parija and S. Panigrahi. ‘Fundamental understanding and modeling of spin coating process: A review’, Indian Journal of Physics, Vol. 83(4), pp. 493-502,
  • Nelson, J. (2003). The Physics of Solar Cells, Imperial College Press, London, p. 363.
  • Edwards, A. Porch, M. Jones, D. Morgan and R. M. Perks. “Basic materials physics of transparent conducting oxides”, Dalton Transactions, Vol. 2004(19), pp. 2995-3002,
  • Sullivan, G. Collis, L. Rochford, J. Arantes, P. Kemppinen, T. Jones and K. Winzenberg, “An N-ethylated barbituric acid end-capped bithiophene as an electron-acceptor material infullerene-free organic photovoltaics”, Chemical Communications, Vol. 51, pp. 6222—6225,
  • Pudasaini, P. R., & Ayon, a. (2013). Low-cost, high-efficiency organic/inorganic hetero-junction hybrid solar cells for next generation photovoltaic device. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 476, 12140. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/476/1/012140
  • Po, C. Carbonera, A. Bernardi and N. Camaioni. “The role of buffer layers in polymer solar cells”, Energy & Environmental Science, Vol. 4. pp. 285-310,
  • Radosavljevi, J., & Amelija, Đ. (2001). Defining of the Intensity of Solar Radiation on Horizontal and Oblique Surfaces on Earth, 2, 77–86.
  • Clarke, J. Durrant. “Charge Photogeneration in Organic Solar Cells”, Chemical Reviews, Vol. 110(2665), pp. 6736-6767, 2010.
  • Würfel, D. Neher, A. Spie and S. Albrecht, “Impact of charge transport on current–voltage characteristics and power-conversion efficiency of organic solar cells”, Nature communications, Vol. 6, pp. 1-9, 2014.
  • Murugesan, K. Sun and J. Ouyang, “Highly efficient inverted polymer solar cells with a solution-processable dendrimer as the electron-collection interlayer”, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 102, pp. 083302-4, 2013.
  • Beek, M. Wienk and R. Janssen, Efficient hybrid solar cells from zinc oxide nanoparticles and a conjugated polymer, Advanced Materials, Vol. 16(12), pp. 1009- 1013, 2004.
  • Cai, X. Gong and Y. Cao. “Polymer solar cells: recent development and possible routes for improvement in the performance”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, Vol. 94(2), pp. 114-127, 2010.
  • Ma, C. Yang, X. Gong, K. Lee and A. Heeger. “Thermally Stable, Efficient Polymer Solar Cells with Nanoscale Control of the Interpenetrating Network Morphology”, Vol. 15(10), pp. 1617–1622, 2005.
  • G. Adams and R.E. Day (1877) “The action of light on selenium” in Proceedings of the Royal Society, A25, 113.
  • Wang, J. L., Zhong, C., Tang, Z. M., Wu, H., Ma, Y., Cao, Y., & Pei, J. (2010). Solution-processed bulk heterojunction photovoltaic cells from gradient ??-conjugated thienylene vinylene dendrimers. Chemistry – An Asian Journal, 5(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/asia.200900245
  • Wilson, A. H., Proc. Roy. Soc. A (1931), 133, 458; 134, 277.
  • Xu, T., & Yu, L. (2014). How to design low bandgap polymers for highly efficient organic solar cells. Materials Today, 17(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.12.005
  • Y, Yuan, J. Huang and G. Li. “Intermediate layers in tandem organic solar cells: review”, Green, Vol. 1, pp. 65–80,


Related Posts

Leave a Comment