Home / Case Studies Solutions / A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital – Case Study Solution

A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital – Case Study Solution

A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital

 

A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital – Summary:

  • Hospital jumping is a term to describe the movement of incompetent and potentially negligent employees From hospital to hospital.
  • Ridgeview Hospital was sued for negligence .
  • The case involved the alleged incorrect medication that nearly caused the child’s death.
  • The party bringing suit contended that the nurse who administered the drug was negligent
  • It was learned that the nurse had been hired by Ridgeview before it had received a letter of reference from her previous employer verifying her employment history.
  • John Reeves,director of hospital, took the position that reference checks were a waste of time.
  • Reeves’s lawyer concluded to choose between two alternatives in adopting a personnel screening policy.
    • It could continue not to verify references, thereby risking malpractice suits such as the one discussed.
    • Alternatively, it could implement a policy of giving out all information on past employees and risk defamation suits.

 

A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital

A Malpractice Suit against a Hospital Questions & Answers:

  1. Which of the two alternatives would you recommend to the hospital?

Answer:

  • The hospital needs to re-evaluate its recruiting process.
  • The problem is that this approach,can be very costly.
  • Upgrade its recruiting process.
  • Aptitude test might be appropriate in this situation.
  • Attention should also be given on establishing or revising the current reference checking system.

 

2. What question could be asked in a recruitment interview to help eliminate the problem?

Answer:

  • In this case, the hospital has a right, if not an ethical obligation to probe into the background of applicants. Human life is at stake.
  • Employee with a history of hospital jumping would have to be regarded as a risk and hired only as a last alternative after a thorough investigation of his or her work history.